Integrating the DIEP and muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM techniques optimizes surgical outcomes: presentation of an algorithm for microsurgical breast reconstruction based on perforator anatomy.
نویسنده
چکیده
BACKGROUND Optimal surgical outcomes in autogenous breast reconstruction require a balance between the reliability of older transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap techniques and the decreased donor-site morbidity of the newer deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap techniques. This article presents an approach to autogenous breast reconstruction that uses principles of both techniques. METHODS One hundred twenty patients receiving 140 breast reconstructions (100 unilateral and 20 bilateral) using the DIEP or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM techniques were retrospectively reviewed over a 5-year period. All patients before January of 2004 (group 1, n = 107 flaps) received the DIEP flap. Patients after January of 2004 (group 2, n = 33 flaps) were approached using an integrated technique and received either the DIEP or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM based on the perforator anatomy identified at the time of surgery. RESULTS Average follow-up was 27 months for group 1 (range, 5.2 to 43 months) and 8 months for group 2 (range, 3 to 18 months). By applying the surgical technique according to the algorithm presented, the success rate has been increased to 100 percent (33 of 33 flaps, p = 0.0425, group 2) over the past 18 months without increasing donor-site morbidity. This compares with a success rate of only 92 percent (98 of 107 flaps, group 1) when the DIEP was attempted nonselectively in every case. CONCLUSION By integrating DIEP and MS-2 surgical techniques and selectively applying the surgical technique according to the perforator anatomy, microsurgical breast reconstruction can be more reliably offered to patients while still minimizing donor-site morbidity.
منابع مشابه
Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference?
The advantages of breast reconstruction using the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap and the muscle-sparing free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap (MS-2) are well recognized. Both techniques optimize abdominal function by maintaining the vascularity, innervation, and continuity of the rectus abdominis muscle. The purpose of this study was to compare these two...
متن کاملBreast Reconstruction with Microvascular MS-TRAM and DIEP Flaps
The free muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps involve transferring skin and subcutaneous tissue from the lower abdominal area and have many features that make them well suited for breast reconstruction. The robust blood supply of the free flap reduces the risk of fat necrosis and also enables aggressive shaping of...
متن کاملScars and perforator-based flaps in the abdominal region: a contraindication?
BACKGROUND Although multiple strategies for autologous breast reconstruction exist, a vertical midline scar in the abdominal wall as a result of previous laparatomy or abdominoplasty represents a major surgical challenge. To date, little research has been conducted on the regeneration potential of the abdominal wall's superficial vascular, perforator and choke vessel system after surgery using ...
متن کاملBreast Reconstruction Using a TRAM Free Flap with a Mini-Abdominoplasty Design and Flap Beveling
Breast cancer is the most common malignant disease in the female population. Significant psychological, social, and sexual morbidity can follow mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer owing to the realization of the life-threatening disease as well as impaired body image [1]. Breast reconstruction improves the patient’s self-confidence after the loss of a breast from cancer or trauma [2]. Of ...
متن کاملIncreased Flap Weight and Decreased Perforator Number Predict Fat Necrosis in DIEP Breast Reconstruction
BACKGROUND Compromised perfusion in autologous breast reconstruction results in fat necrosis and flap loss. Increased flap weight with fewer perforator vessels may exacerbate imbalances in flap perfusion. We studied deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) and muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flaps to assess this concept. METHODS Data from patients who under...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Plastic and reconstructive surgery
دوره 119 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007